read this from the guys at asi.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nIf you think the current situation warrants a wry smile, carry on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The provider of the prime measurement service to the US broadcast industry is Nielsen. I believe it\u2019s been Nielsen since before the invention of the television. Some say Nielsen was standing there and someone invented TV around it. It\u2019s always been Nielsen. I think it must be the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Although Nielsen has the wherewithal to report otherwise the US industry talks almost only of programme ratings. No-one directly references the audience to commercials. These are nasty interruptive things (NITs) that get in the way of the art that fills American airwaves. Inconveniently these NITs pay for everything and so their presence has to be acknowledged, albeit with the sort of sneer a certain class of Brit reserves for the word \u2018trade\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Broadcast television is the only thing that works for US advertisers. This has been true since the dawn of time. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That said, there is concern around the rise of strange organisations like Google, Facebook and TikTok. These things are evil, and fraudulent, the work of the devil and no advertiser in their right mind would ever spend any money with them (actually that bit isn\u2019t quite so crazy).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Advertisers want big audiences. On TV. The bigger the better, as long as they\u2019re on TV. If you\u2019re an advertiser and believe you may want something else, targeted messages, say, you\u2019ve been attending too many conferences and your brain has become warped. This is a curable condition. Just pop along to your nearest upfront and you\u2019ll feel better soon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Agencies want what advertisers want and do what advertisers do. If they depart from this way of thinking they\u2019re wrong and will soon find out why via a review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US view is that the rest of the world knows nothing about advertising, media, audience measurement or indeed research in general. The rest of the world is mistaken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US media industry can appropriate descriptors for its organisations, regardless of those descriptors meaning something else, somewhere \/ everywhere else (a precedent was set with The World Series). When the US broadcast industry calls something a Joint Industry Committee or JIC then that is what it is. Established bodies in overseas (aka less sophisticated) markets, like the UK\u2019s BARB which for many decades has thought itself to be a JIC needs to reconsider. It is clearly no such thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US media industry is focused 1000% on providing value to advertisers. Value is defined by big numbers (like 1000%). If you believe that there is value to be had in concepts like contextual relevance, or attention paid to what\u2019s on the screen, or to understanding audience behaviours you\u2019re misguided. Or a socialist. Probably both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Buyers buy big numbers. Editorial context doesn\u2019t matter. Nor does behaviour. Nor do end-business-results. These things over-complicate \u2013 they get in the way of delivering the big numbers by making the big numbers smaller. And that\u2019s a bad thing (see above).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Every now and again the US media industry starts a new body to demonstrate commitment to accuracy, and innovation. Their representatives are sent out into the world like missionaries, to convert the heathens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The heathens (aside from the odd cynical blogger) are unfailingly polite to the missionaries. They nod a lot. And they don\u2019t change a thing. The heathens know better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sometimes there\u2019s talk of alternative currencies. New methods are talked about. Advertisers express concern using words like \u2018transparency\u2019 and \u2018verifiable\u2019. Agencies consider. Everyone knows you can\u2019t have more than one true currency, whatever happens around the margins. The currency continues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
US multinationals\u2019 marketing and media directors are brilliant speakers, with massive budgets. They are as a result listened to, and their thoughts largely ignored. Indeed, by their actions or lack thereof<\/a> they eventually ignore themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\nLife goes merrily along. Buyers buy and sellers sell. Programmes get made; detergent gets sold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Until one day it doesn\u2019t.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I often catch myself staring out of my office window. My garden shed is I admit dull, but when the option is to read still more on developments within the US TV audience measurement world, its permanence reassures. For those not fully up-to-speed with this issue, this post is here to provide a cynical (and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1687"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1687"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1688,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1687\/revisions\/1688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}