{"id":1886,"date":"2025-09-03T12:39:52","date_gmt":"2025-09-03T11:39:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/?p=1886"},"modified":"2025-09-03T12:39:52","modified_gmt":"2025-09-03T11:39:52","slug":"plan-what-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/plan-what-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"Plan? What Plan?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u2018Planning\u2019 is having a moment. There are posts on measurement, on MMM, on Origin, on cross-media, on using data, on owning data, on what we mean (or should mean) by outcomes, on where we\u2019re all going wrong and from when. At least it makes a change from the horrible mess that is \u2018buying\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>The trouble is, \u2018planning\u2019 has become one of those words that means different things depending on who\u2019s using it. It is a member of the ignoble club of mis-understanding. Fellow members include \u2018outcomes\u2019, \u2018reach\u2019, \u2018impressions\u2019, \u2018views\u2019, even \u2018agency\u2019. To qualify for membership, any attempt to define what exactly a word means is followed by: \u2018It depends\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To an OOH specialist, the proportionate mix of different formats constitutes \u2018planning\u2019. To a video expert the balance between broadcast, streaming, YouTube, FB Video requires \u2018planning\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s nothing in any way wrong with this, what we used to call intra-media planning is essential but there\u2019s an issue that is a lot more consequential than what we put in some dictionary of terms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And that issue is: clients won\u2019t pay for intra-media planning. Why should they? The balance between OOH contractor A and contractor B is something the agency does as a matter of course. They can\u2019t buy space (in this case) without doing it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Agencies have since the dawn of time worried about how to increase their revenues. I remember the old commission versus fee debates; and the jealous glances cast in the direction of management consultancies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Regardless of what is on social media, this is not a new problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Cog Blog has commented many times over the last 12 years on the various smart, devious, open, hidden ways agencies have tried to extract more from their clients; or as the agencies (and I) would prefer it \u2013 how to get paid fairly for the value they bring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Increasing revenues from clients falls into the too difficult bucket for many, who prefer the easier route of looking to vendors. This is neither wise nor any kind of long-term strategy for success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Agencies of all hues spend their lives advising clients on what they should do. \u2018Listen to your customers; make sure you satisfy a customer need\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Five years ago <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/agency-lessons-from-recessions\/\">in a post<\/a> considering lessons from the 2020 recession I wrote:<br><strong><em>\u201cWe are very quick to offer advice to others but, like the cobbler whose children went without shoes we are less good when it comes to our own industry\u201d.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We all know clients need help. Furthermore, \u2018planning\u2019 as I mean it, is immensely valuable to clients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How to justify and build my budget? How to split the budget? What % to advertising, what to events \/ PR \/ sponsorships? Within advertising, what to video, what to audio, what to online? Within online what to Meta, etc. And on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The last part of those questions is classic agency-land; the first part isn\u2019t. The middle bit? Sort-of, depends on who you believe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And yet it\u2019s the first part that\u2019s the most valuable, the most needed, and also where the greatest opportunity lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marketing budgets are by definition larger than ad budgets; offering services that move upstream from advertising can if done well unlock new sources of revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s essential in explaining effect. Which channel delivers the greatest effect is an important and actionable output from modelling; what happens downstream, within a channel is less easily explained in any manner that can be acted upon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s the difference between strategy and tactics; between upstream and downstream; between big picture and points of detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These are all comms issues; how to use different channels to communicate. There\u2019s a whole separate stream of expertise built around what used to be called account planning; what to say on these channels and how to say it. The two streams are interwoven, like two strands of rope combining to make the rope stronger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This may all sound a bit esoteric, but it isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Clients won\u2019t pay extra for planning, so runs the perceived wisdom. No, they won\u2019t nor should they if \u2018planning\u2019 means deciding between YouTube and TikTok.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But if \u2018planning\u2019 means building and justifying a budget, dividing up what can be done by advertising, and what by some other means of communicating a message, then working hand-in-glove with creative teams to ensure a perfect fit between medium and message, two factors come into play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, you\u2019re more likely to deliver success. Second, you\u2019ll be providing value worth paying for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Planning is the key to rebuilding the trusted relationship between the agency as partner and the client.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u2018Planning\u2019 is having a moment. There are posts on measurement, on MMM, on Origin, on cross-media, on using data, on owning data, on what we mean (or should mean) by outcomes, on where we\u2019re all going wrong and from when. At least it makes a change from the horrible mess that is \u2018buying\u2019.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1886"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1886"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1886\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1887,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1886\/revisions\/1887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bjanda.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}